Showing posts with label statistics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label statistics. Show all posts

Saturday, January 16, 2021

Don't Know the Half of It

Despite its collective efforts, the scientific community knows a lot less about how the world works than I usually give it credit for.

Wednesday, December 9, 2020

Bayes As Odds

 An intuitive way to understand Bayesian updating is via odds instead of probabilities or percentages. (chapter 8 - Updating - of Reason Better by David Manley)

Saturday, October 10, 2020

Map Ain't Territory Reminder

Scientific models like causal DAGs are probably much cruder instruments for understanding real-life complex phenomena than I have been hoping recently.

Sunday, September 6, 2020

Science is 'Kaleidoscopic'

Science is collaborative in a variety of ways: many individuals working on the same or related problems, and those individuals employing several distinct methodologies to attack those problem clusters.

Wednesday, August 19, 2020

Fake-Data Simulation

Fake-data simulation is an extension of abductive reasoning, specifically exploring the implications of various competing hypotheses.

Thursday, July 23, 2020

Statistical Garnish

"Statistical garnish" is prevalent in opinion articles & debates: using a small set of fancy-seeming stats to support your case, contra a genuine attempt to understand the scientific/statistical literature on an issue (like SSC often does).

Wednesday, July 22, 2020

Forward & Backward "Why" Questions

There are at least two distinct types of 'why' questions: specific ones about (forward) causal inference, and abductive ones about generating new hypotheses (reverse).

Saturday, June 27, 2020

Thursday, June 11, 2020

Collider Bias

There are more complicated correlations that don't equal causation, such as collider bias. (I learned this reading chapters 4-6 of The Book of Why.)

Sunday, February 9, 2020

Statistics Is About Ignorance

Statistics is not about detecting facts, but about ignorance.

Monday, February 3, 2020